The Dual Professional
Generalist or specialist?
I have predominantly worked in the dance sector and the disability sector, however, I have difficulty defining my specialist area of expertise. I have always considered myself an 'all-rounder', a generalist. I have a strong background in working with people in variety of ways, including:
- coaching
- rehabilitation
- teaching - theory and experiential
- support work
- recreation facilitation
- one on one, and groups
- students in tertiary institutions,
- older people within community based rehabilitation,
- people who have experience historical or recent trauma,
- adults with intellectual disability within recreational programmes and residential support,
- I have worked with people of all ages and abilities within community dance based practice.
The knowledge and skills required for these roles range from specialist knowledge, such as, the techniques of safely using a white cane (for people who are blind), to more generalised skills, such as effective communication, flexibility, self-care and time management.
In my current role, I teach Disability Support and Integrated Practice for the two year two disability specialty students completing their diploma in Social Services. In addition, I am developing the disability speciality into Level 7 so that students can continue this speciality into their third year.
I have found that teaching requires all of the generalised skills outlined above, therefore I have been able transfer these skills quite easily into my teaching role at Polytechnic. I have even been able to utilise some of my specialist knowledge. For instance, this year I taught my students, studying disability support, sighted guide technique (a well developed, respectful and safe way for a sighted person to guide someone who is blind or visually impaired).
One of the main differences between my specialist areas of expertise and my current teaching role is program development. Part of my role is to develop a Level 7 paper for the disability speciality. I have to decide on the aims and learning outcomes of the paper, the content, the delivery and the assessment process. This is a completely new skill for me, as result, I feel lacking in the necessary knowledge and confidence. I had to acknowledge that I needed help with this, and have been able to working closely with another more experienced staff member.
Teaching in the 21st Century
As part of the learning journey in the Practice Context course we were asked to watch the video '21st Century Education vs 20th Century Education'. The video outlines all of the major differences between the focus, style and direction of education in these two time periods, and concludes by asking the question which option would you choose?
My role as a tertiary educator in the 21st century as indicated in the video is one of facilitator rather than authority. I am there to support active learning and discovery; to learn about my students so that I can deliver the curriculum in ways that will inspire and motivate them. Learning is focused on outcomes, and making connections and learning relevant to the 'real world'.
Much of my learning at high school involved both 20th Century and 21st Century learning as I was in school nearing the end of the 20th century. Having a taste of both, I not only relate more closely to the 21st century views on education but I much prefer them. I really struggled in school when subjects involved passive learning and when exams involved recalling facts from the entire year. Instead, I excelled in subjects where I was actively involved in the learning process and where assessments where made up of many small assignments that involved research, exploration and thinking about my own point of view.
What are the limitations of an 'able-bodied' teacher, teaching 'dissability' studies?
I enjoy learning and teaching about disability but this has not come without personal delimmas...
When I was completing my Masters on dance and disability and now as a teacher in disability studies I have often wondered about the impact of being an non-disabled person working within this field. Deborah Marks (1996) explores such as dilemma, asking, as an able-bodied teacher, teaching disability studies does the course risk slipping into an examination of "others"? Marks (1996) takes a pragmatic approach, by asking what can I do to transform the patronising representations, exclusion and oppression of disabled people? The author explains that their role is two-fold: to be concerned with resisting the exclusion and oppression of disabled people and to critically think about what attracted them to this field in the first place.
Marks (1996) resists exclusion and oppression of disabled people by engaging with disabled educators and writers, involving disabled people in teaching, and identifying any exclusionary practices operating within their institution. I definitely involve people with disabilities in my teaching by inviting guest speakers to share their experience and knowledge with the students. In 2011, I had the opportunity to attend a international conference on disability studies and was able to engage with writers and educators with disabilities. I would love to have this kind of professional development opportunity again. Reading Marks (1996) paper made me realise that I could be more active on campus. A great exercise would be to connect with students and staff with disabilities and find out if/how they are excluded at Otago Polytechnic and what could be done to change such practices.
Marks (1996) explained that through research and reflection they came to understand that the "other" is always a construction. A construction which relies on the fears and fantasies of not only the "other" but the fears of fantasies of ourselves. The first couple of times I engaged with a person with a disability I remember feeling a lot of anxiety and fear.
Philip Patston (2007) describes this fear as dysfuntionphobia, the fear or hatred of losing function, or becoming unable to function independently. This fear stems from our aversion of dependence that we might associate with childhood, old age and vulnerability. I was taken aback by the strong fearful reaction I had when engaging with someone with a disability and this internalised reaction is what first attracted me to the field of disability studies. I was curious about my fears and fantasies of myself and of the 'other'. I can now see the construction of the 'other' quite clearly and feel much more comfortable with the fluidity of human function.
Relating the above point back to my teaching practice I need to think about how I can encourage students to consider their own fears and begin to break down the wall between 'us' and 'them'. There is a strong self-reflective aspect to our course, particularly in the second semester Integrated Practice paper. Using our group supervision and the students reflective journals would be a perfect opportunity to challenge students to consider how dysfuntionphobia has impacted on their own interactions with people with disabilities.
Understanding Your Organisation
The Tertiary Education Strategy 2014 - 2019 (Ministry of Education 2014) signals a need for a strong focus on outcomes: Economic, Environmental and Social.
- Economic outcomes involve employment, high incomes and better access to skilled employees for business.
- Environmental outcomes involves providing individuals with skills and knowledge related to preserving our eco-systems and wisely managing our natural resources.
- Social outcomes involve people gaining the skills to become successful and productive citizens, as well as promote social cohesion and democratic values.
- There is also a focus on Māori educational success.
- Delivering skills for industry
- Getting at-risk young people into a career
- Boosting achievement for Maori and Pasifika
- Improving adults literacy and numeracy
- Strengthening research based institutions
- Growing international linkages
(Ministry of Education 2014)
I can see many links between the priorities set our above and the priorities at Otago Polytechnic, predominantly in the areas of:
- developing values of sustainability within staff and students,
- developing programs that meet industry standards so our students are highly sought after,
- improving achievement for Māori and Pasifika students, and
- becoming research active.
The links I made above are evident in the Otago Polytechnic's, 'Architecture for Execellence', located on the Polytechnics 'insite' intranet. This site contains the Polytechnics stragetic documents and supporting frameworks, and is visualised as a house. The roof contains the over-arching vision and mission statement, and strategic goals:
- Vision: To be recognised nationally and internationally as New Zealand's leading polytechnic.
- Mission: we serve society and out customers by enabling those who desire to learn to connect with the most relevant learning experiences.
- Strategic goals: 1. achieving education excellence; 2. being a resiliant organisation; 3. Collaborating with our communities to make a difference, prioritising Kai Tahu; 4. Making a difference to our environment.
- Strategic frameworks: 1. research and enterprise; 2. learning and teaching; 3. Sustainability;
4. Māori. - Processes for change: continuous improvement, self assessment, self-managing teams, and good to great.
The floor of the house, the foundation, incorporates our culture and our values that underpin 'how we do things': caring, responsibility, partnership, excellence and sustainability.
(Otago Polytechnic, n.d.)
I have been encouraged and supported to incorporate the above 'architecture for excellence' into my own teaching practice by the paper coorindators and other team members. This is particularly evident in relation to the four strategic frameworks:
- To work towards becoming research active the Bachelor of Social Services team formed a writing group so that we can support each other as we prepare papers for presentations and publications.
- In order to fillful the strategic frameworks of learning and teaching and Māori, I have the responsibility as a staff member to gain qualifications in tertiary teaching and Te Reo Māori and tikaka; and incorporate this knowledge into my own practice framworks.
- There are many ways that sustainability is encouraged in our school, from the availability of recycling bins to discussions on how we can support students to become 'sustainable' practitioners through models of self-care, reflection and supervision.
The area that I am least familiar with is the second strategic goal, becoming a resilient organisation, which involves the following goals:
- We are future focussed and highly adaptable
- Our operational processes are sustainable
- Our organisation and management is world class
- We invest in appropriate innovation and development
- We make a consistent annual operating surplus to fund future investment
- We have an outstanding work environment
- We collaborate effectively to achieve our objectives.
(Otago Polytechnic, 2014)
I have very limited knowledge about how the above goals are realised at Otago Polytechnic and perhaps indicate a need to gain knowledge on the larger operational, managerial and organisational workings of the institution. This is no surprise considering this my first year teaching at Otago Polytechnic. A good place to start would be to throughly read through the links and files on the OP strategy documents and supporting frameworks insite page. Talking with colleagues and attending seminars for staff around such organisational matters would also be beneficial.
Professional Development Areas:
Through out this practice story I have identified the follow professional development areas in need of further exploration and attention:
- Programme and curriculum development.
- Investigate approaches to teaching that utilise the principals of 21st century teaching.
- As a non-disabled teacher of disability studies become actively involved on campus to identify ways in which staff and students with disabilities are excluded.
- Encourage students studying disability support to engage criticially about why they are studying disability and challenge their notions of 'us' and 'them'.
- Become more proactive in learning about the broader organisational functioning at Otago Polytechnic and gain understanding of how and where I fit into this.
References
21st Educator (2009). 21st Century Education vs. 20th Century Education [YouTube video]. Accessed 2 November 2014, retrieved from URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiD1UqLPrOg.
Marks, D. (1996). Able-bodied Dilemmas in Teaching and Disability Studies. In: Wilkinson, S. & Kitzinger, C. (ed). Representing the Other: a Feminism Psychology Reader, chapter 7, p64 - 67. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Ministry of Education (2014). Tertiary Education Strategy 2014 - 2019. Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. Accessed 2 November 2014, retrieved from URL: http://www.minedu.govt.nz/~/media/MinEdu/Files/EducationSectors/TertiaryEducation/TertiaryEducationStrategy2014/MOE_TES2014_V9.pdf
Otago Polytechnic (2014). Otago Polytechnic Strategic Directions 2015-2017. Accessed 3 November 2014, retrieved from URL: http://insite.op.ac.nz/Pages/OP-Strategy-Doc’s-and-Supporting-Frameworks.aspx
Otago Polytechnic (n.d.). Insite: OP Strategic Doc's and Supporting Frameworks [intranet]. Accessed 3 November 2014, retrieved from URL: http://insite.op.ac.nz/Pages/OP-Strategy-Doc’s-and-Supporting-Frameworks.aspx
Otago Polytechnic (n.d.). Insite: OP Strategic Doc's and Supporting Frameworks [intranet]. Accessed 3 November 2014, retrieved from URL: http://insite.op.ac.nz/Pages/OP-Strategy-Doc’s-and-Supporting-Frameworks.aspx
Patston, P. (2007). Constructive Functional Diversity: a new paradigm beyond disability and impairment. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(20-21), 1625 - 1633. Accessed 2 November 2014, retrieved from DOI: 10.1080/09638280701618778